53 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Neuvirth’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[n]o holder of a permit issued under [R.C. 4507.05(A)] shall operate a motor vehicle upon a highway or any public or private property used by the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking in violation of the conditions established under [R.C. 4507.05(A)].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dumas

2. “(1) daylight hours only, (2) no riders, (3) not valid on congested roads and interstate highways, and (4) must wear approved protective helmet and use eye protection.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dumas

3. “[i]t does not follow that one may be found guilty of driving without a permit simply because one has violated restrictions imposed on that permit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dumas