Curtis v. Chiaramonte’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2007
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and was supported by an affidavit from her doctor. The trial court denied the continuance and dismissed with prejudice. The court of appeals found it was an abuse of discretion to dismiss the case with prejudice, and remanded the cause to the trial court. The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the court of appeals' decision. {¶ 19} The Ohio Supreme Court, quoting Buck at 538, found that a continuance is proper for an absent party when”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.