Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 OHIOST3D 107 - State v. Landrum

State v. Landrum’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

930
cited by 930 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 899 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 930 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Mills (1992), State v. Smith (1997)

19 federal appellate · 899 state decisions

31301990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Doyle v. Ohio · Lockett v. Ohio · Roviaro v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 930 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
    53 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] careful and searching voir dire provides the best test of whether prejudicial pretrial publicity has prevented obtaining a fair and impartial jury from the locality.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The Constitution does not guarantee an 'error free, perfect trial . . . .'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.