Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 Okla. 142

155 P 521

Dill v. Marks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1916-02-15

<p> Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Caruthers; Judge. </p> <p>Action by William Marks against W. H. Dill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.</p>

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1934

8 state decisions

Relies on Board of Comrs. of Woods Co. v. Oxley · Marvel v. White · White v. Hooker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1916-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 In this case the case-made was filed in, this court on the last day of the. six-months period allowed for perfecting the appeal. Eight days thereafter there was filed with the clerk of this court a purported petition in error, and the cause is now pending. before us on motion to dismiss on the ground that the proceedings were not commenced within the statutory period. The point is well taken, and the appeal must be dismissed. A petition in error is a necessary requisite to the commencement of the proceedings, which “shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.” Chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11; White v. Hooker et al., 47 Okla. 453, 148 Pac. 719; McMasters v. English et al., 26 Okla. 818, 110 Pac. 1070; Board of County Commissioners v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502, 58 Pac. 651; Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 739, 50 Pac. 87.

¶2 Dismissed.

/53/okla/142 · .json · Public domain