Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Okla. 205 - Peed v. Gresham

Peed v. Gresham’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1949
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1949

6 state decisions

201916192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Norris v. Cross, Secretary of State · Dunham v. Ardery · State Ex Rel. Friend, Co. Atty. v. Cummings · Board of Com'rs of Seminole County v. State Ex Rel. · Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Keys

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•‘By statute in this jurisdiction (sees. 4918-4915, Rev. Laws 1910), the alternative writ and return thereto constitute the pleadings in a mandamus proceeding, and the issues thereby joined must be tried and the further proceedings had in the same manner as in a civil action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.