Interstate Compress Co. v. Arthur’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 1955
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grand Trunk Ry Co of Canada v. Ives · Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Duran · Chickasaw Compress Co. v. Bow · Sans Bois Coal Co. v. Janeway · Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Blunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The master is bound to exercise reasonable care and diligence to provide a'reasonably safe place in which the employe or servant is to work, and also reasonably safe machinery, tools, and appliances with which to perform the work required of him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.