Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

53 Or. 243

State v. Cook

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1909

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1909-02-23

From Coos: James W. Hamilton, Judge. W. T. Cook and David Clink were indicted, tried and convicted of gambling, and from the judgment and sentence which followed, the defendants appeal. Submitted on briefs under the proviso of Buie 16 of the Supreme Court. 50 Or. 580.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1924

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Bay

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1909-02-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice King

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2These defendants were tried in the circuit court under an indictment charging them with unlawfully playing a gambling game known as “Klondike,” and they, having been convicted and sentenced to pay a fine, appeal. The same legal problem is presented here as in State V. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), making an affirmance necessary; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

/53/or/243 · .json · Public domain