Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 OR 410 - Ashley v. Pick

Ashley v. Pick’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 1942
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1942

12 state decisions

6019091910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rutenic v. Hamakar · Pierstoff v. Jorges · Preston v. Mann · S. B. Page & Co. v. Smith · Young v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In pleading a judgment or other determination of a court or officer of- special jurisdiction, it shall not be necessary to state the facts conferring jurisdiction, but such judgment or determination may be stated to have been duly given or made. If such allegation be controverted, the party pleading shall be bound to establish on the trial the facts conferring jurisdiction. ’ ’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Canuto v. Weinberger · Evans v. Marvin
  2. ““We have taken this opportunity to indicate_ that the rule in respect to the manner of pleading^ a judgment of an inferior tribunal, as announced in Page v. Smith, 13 Or. 410 ( 10 Pac. 833 ), will no longer be observed, and to give notice that where it' is stated in the formal allegations of parties that a judgment was ‘duly given’ or ‘duly made’ the statute has been fully complied with, and that the averment will be held to be sufficient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Marshall v. Marshall

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.