Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 P.3d 165 - State v. Simpson

State v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2024

13 state decisions

60200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montana v. Egelhoff · State v. Egelhoff · State v. Korell · Neitzel v. State · State v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not require proof of any culpable mental state regarding ... the fact that the driver was intoxicated or that the driver's blood-alcohol content exceeded [the legal limit]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Voluntary intoxication may not be taken into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is an element of a criminal offense. Voluntary intoxication does not relieve a person of a duty to act if failure to act constitutes a criminal offense. Evidence that a person was voluntarily intoxicated may be admissible to show whether or not the person was physically capable of performing the act with which the person is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[cJrimi-nal law texts on this subject ... suggest that we may have gone too far in Morgan when we suggested that [the offense of driving under the influence] invariably requires proof that the defendant knowingly ingested alcohol or other intoxicants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.