State v. Eaker’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc. · Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] jury instruction that relieves the prosecution of its burden to prove an element of a crime is subject to harmless error analysis unless the error is structural and affects the framework under which the trial proceeds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LB“`Applied to an element omitted from, or misstated in, a jury instruction, the error was harmless if that element is supported by uncontroverted evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.