E.B. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably In the Interest of J.C. (2004), State Ex Rel. T.M. (2006)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Sl · N.T. v. State · State in Interest of CY v. Yates · Wessel v. Erickson Landscaping Co. · Hart v. Salt Lake County Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Application of statutory law to the facts presents a mixed question of fact and law. We review the juvenile court's findings for clear error and its conclusions of law for correctness, affording the court `some discretion in applying the law to the facts.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Moreover, we defer to the juvenile court because of its advantageous position with respect to the parties and the witnesses in assessing credibility and personalities.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. T.Y. v. State · State Ex Rel. V.L.“Findings of fact in a parental rights termination proceeding are overturned only if they are clearly erroneous.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.