Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 P.3d 968 - R.B. v. State

R.B. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2023

21 state decisions

110200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State in Interest of JJT · State in Interest of CY v. Yates · 12 Kan. App. 2d 594 - In Re As · In the Interest of A.S. · D.A. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a parent has been afforded adequate due process is a question of law, reviewed for correctness.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “party is entitled upon timely request to an opportunity to be heard as to the propriety of taking judicial notice and the tenor of the matter noticed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[tlhe appellate court will only find prejudicial error after a review of the record demonstrates that there was a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable result for the [parents]. {Wle must review the record and determine whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the outcome of the termination hearing would have been more favorable to {the parents] had the juvenile court not [committed the due process violation].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.