53 So. 2d 106 - Padgett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1989
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wallace v. State · Nickels v. State · Talley v. State · Wills v. Russell · Henderson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Even if it [recording] had been offered in proper order as rebuttal testimony for impeaching the testimony of defense counsel it would have been inadmissible as defense counsel had not testified regarding the recording." [Emphasis supplied.] 53 So.2d at 109 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that evidence which in any manner shows or tends to show that the accused has committed another crime independent of that for which he is on trial, is inadmissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“such similarity of method or manner of accomplishment as to justify the admission of testimony regarding it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.