Stallworth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 608 So. 2d 784 - Fotopoulos v. State · 648 So. 2d 715 - Perez v. State · 587 So. 2d 487 - Gavins v. State · 650 So. 2d 127 - Kyle v. State · 855 So. 2d 134 - Pryor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party may attack the credibility of any witness, including an accused, by evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime if the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year under the law under which the witness was convicted, or if the crime involved dishonesty or a false statement regardless of the punishment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mosley v. State“Q. Now, Mr. Ducree, have you ever been convicted of a felony? A. Yes, I have. Q. How many times? A. Numerous of times. You don t know how many times? G? I think you mentioned it earlier. <⅞ Would eight times sound right? <3? Could be right. <ri I’m sorry. <3? It could be right. <\”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tilus v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.