Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 So. 3d 537 - State v. Farris

53 So. 3d 537 - State v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford · 600 So. 2d 113 - State v. Linear · 716 So. 2d 36 - State v. Jordan · 406 So. 2d 1314 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we agree that [the defendant] is entitled to the relief requested, we find that the remand should not have the effect of limiting the state to pursuing only the amended charge. That is to say, when a defendant’s plea to a lesser offense is set aside at his request, the state may pursue further prosecution on the greater offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.