Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 SW2D 307 - Dunn v. State

Dunn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 1969
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Clippinger · 73 Tex. Crim. 649 - General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. State · 86 Tex. Crim. 96 - Turpin v. State · 56 Tex. Crim. 73 - Trail v. State · Hamilton v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * While it is true that the Legislature, in article 436 C.C.P., lays down four causes which will exonerate the accused and his sureties from liability upon a forfeited bond, and said article states that these causes, ‘And no other,’ will so release them, still this court has in so many cases held that when the so-called indictment was not such in law because of some fundamental failure, from which there flowed as a necessary sequence lack of authority to require any bond at all, that in such cases and upon proper showing of such facts, this court would hold that the parties on such bond, having never been lawfully bound, could not be held to pay same, and we find ourselves constrained to adhere to the doctrine of these cases. * * * .” See also authorities there cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.