Keeton v. Carrasco’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 224th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Carr v. Brasher · Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. · Broders v. Heise · Goode v. Shoukfeh · Curtis v. Gibbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[An article 4590i, section 13.01 expert report] is competent evidence that section 13.01(k) renders inadmissible; therefore, it contains a defect in form. If Greenfield’s alternative assertion were correct, an expert who provides the report used by the plaintiff to comply with section 13.01 could never provide the content of that report in another form for use in opposition to a summary judgment. Section 13.01(k) only prohibits the use of the “expert report” filed under section 13.01. Section 13.01(k) does not prohibit the expert who provides that report from providing another report for other purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Coleman v. Woolf
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.