Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 SW3D 297 - Brown v. Todd

Brown v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

115 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Allen v. Wright · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Raines v. Byrd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his proposed rationale for standing is too broad because the injury he identifies is not unique to him. Indeed, it is shared by all living Houstonians who were among the 198,563 electors who actually voted against the proposed ordinance. In no way does [the plaintiffs] status as a voter give him an interest sufficiently peculiar to satisfy our standing requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Because standing is a component of subject matter jurisdiction, we consider ... standing as we would a plea to the jurisdiction, construing the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff.”) (citing Worth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 501 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 , 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975); Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445); Bland Indep. Sch. Dist., 34 S.W.3d at 554 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “As we have repeatedly recognized, if our jurisdiction is properly invoked on one issue, we acquire jurisdiction of the entire case.”). 8 .The general contract utilized a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.