Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 UTAH 282 - Van Cott v. Wall

Van Cott v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2016

7 state decisions

2019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. Drew · Chapman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Kullberg v. O'Donnell · Taylor v. Kidd · McInnes v. Sutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “power of review is strictly limited to the record presented on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.