Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 VT 30 - Bacon v. Bates

Bacon v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
March 1932
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1932

4 state decisions

20188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The promise, agreement, and undertaking of each party, was a sufficient consideration for the promise, agreement, and undertaking of every other . party to such novation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.