State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1984
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pearson · State v. Murphy · State v. Hill · State v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Both on cross-examination and redirect examination the witness testified that he was familiar with ‘United States money,’ and that ‘it was United States currency,’ and that ‘it looked like United States money.’ He also described the several denominations of the bills alleged to have been stolen. The weight to be given to this evidence was for the jury. . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown““The instruction complained of states the law, and when this appears, this court will not compare the instruction given by the court with a requested instruction on the same subject, for the form of the instruction has been repeatedly held by us to be immaterial. This is elementary, and needs no citation of authority.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lowenthal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.