Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 WASH 27 - Ness v. Bothell

Ness v. Bothell’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1930
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cunningham v. Lakin · Reese v. Murnan · Davis v. Hinchcliffe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “/‘All the questions raised by the appellant, with the. exception of the question in relation to the filing of the amended answer, are questions which depend upon the. evidence. In an equity case the duty of this court is to ascertain what the rights of the parties- are under, the evidence, and it will be impossible • to do that if the evidence is not all here. The plain contemplation of our statute as to appeals in equity is that the whole case as presented to the coúrt below should be brought here before the court gets jurisdiction to in any manner interfere with the decree rendered in. said court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.