Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Wash. App. 111 - State v. Faille

53 Wash. App. 111 - State v. Faille’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2017

20 state decisions

701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 47 Wash. App. 232 - State v. Randle · 44 Wash. App. 444 - State v. Sabala · 46 Wash. App. 689 - State v. Hall · 52 Wash. App. 350 - State v. Gotcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) A person is guilty of burglary in the first degree if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, he enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling and if, in entering or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, the actor or another participant in the crime (a) is armed with a deadly weapon, or (b) assaults any person therein."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the guns were readily accessible and available for use, even though they were unloaded and there is no evidence that Faille knew there was ammunition in the house.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “means any explosive or loaded or unloaded firearm, and shall include any other weapon, device, instrument, article, or substance, including a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.