53 Wash. App. 283 - Hines v. Data Line Systems Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
Relies on Pinter v. Dahl · 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · 103 Wash. 2d 768 - Hartley v. State · Lanza v. Drexel & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wash his hands of all corporate decisions particularly when he has access to the same facts as counsel did in the case at hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.