53 Wash. App. 296 - State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2012
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject only to a few exceptions, a search without a warrant is per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 , 19 L. Ed. 2d 576 , 88 S. Ct. 507 (1967). "The exceptions are 'jealously and carefully drawn,' and there must be 'a showing by those who seek exemption . . . that the exigencies of the situation made that course imperative.' '[T]he burden is on those seeking the exemption to show the need for it.'" (Footnotes omitted.) Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 455 , 29 L. Ed. 2d 564 , 91 S. Ct. 2022 (1971).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1. The degree of urgency involved and the amount of time necessary to obtain a warrant. 2. A reasonable belief that the contraband is about to be removed. 3. The possibility of danger to police officers guarding the site while a warrant is sought. 4. Information indicating that the possessors of the contraband are aware that the police are on their trail. 5. The ready destructibility of the contraband and the knowledge that disposal efforts are characteristic behavior of persons engaged in narcotics trafficking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The exceptions are 'jealously and carefully drawn,' and there must be 'a showing by those who seek exemption . . . that the exigencies of the situation made that course imperative.' '[T]he burden is on those seeking the exemption to show the need for it.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.