Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Wash. App. 322 - State v. Leach

53 Wash. App. 322 - State v. Leach’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. States · 63 Ill. 2d 23 - People v. Gilmore · United States v. Meacham · Williams v. State · 98 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bonds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The constitutional principle is generally formulated in terms of due process, i.e., an accused's right to be informed with reasonable certainty of the nature of the charges in order to prepare a defense and to plead a judgment as a bar to any further prosecution for the same offense. . . . Given the harsh consequences of a violation, however, it is evident that the essential elements rule constitutes a category sui generis and rests on principles other than notice alone. Even in situations where the notice function has been satisfied, i.e., the defendant has actual notice of the elements of the charged crime and has not been prejudiced at trial by the defective charging document, the Holt rule mandates automatic dismissal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.