Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 53 Wash. App. 452 - State v. Chiles

53 Wash. App. 452 - State v. Chiles’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Serfass v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Downum v. United States · McCarthy v. Zerbst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]ndecent exposure at common law consists of exposure in public of the entire person or of parts that should not be exhibited.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.