53 Wash. App. 491 - State v. Pockert’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benjamin v. United States · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 108 Wash. 2d 419 - State v. Fisher · 102 Wash. 2d 68 - Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining any sentence, the trial court may rely on no more information than is admitted by the plea agreement, or admitted, acknowledged, or proved in a trial or at the time of sentencing. Acknowledgement includes not objecting to information stated in the presentence reports. Where the defendant disputes material facts, the court must either not consider the fact or grant an evidentiary hearing on the point. The facts shall be deemed proved at the hearing by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“extremely agitated because of the breakup of the relationship and was `getting even' with [the victim].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goodman“an evil intent, wish, or design to vex, annoy, or injure another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goodman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.