53 Wash. App. 527 - State v. Parramore’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 121 Wash. 2d 22 - State v. Riley (1993), 135 Wash. 2d 326 - State v. Riles (1998)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 51 Wash. App. 404 - State v. Barclay · 34 Wash. App. 82 - In Re the Welfare of Hoffer · 50 Wash. App. 228 - State v. Curwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`will always be subjective, and such issues have traditionally been left to the discretion of the sentencing judge.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an order of a court prohibiting conduct that directly relates to the circumstances of the crime for which the offender has been convicted.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ancira · State v. Warren“[p]ersons may be punished for their crimes and they may be prohibited from doing things which are directly related to their crimes, but they may not be coerced into doing things which are believed Will rehabilitate them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Acrey · State v. Julian
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.