Hanson v. Spokane County’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"The superior court may affirm the decision of the board or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse the decision if any substantial rights may have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are: " (a) In violation of constitutional provisions, or "(b) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the board, or "(c) Made upon unlawful procedure, or " (d) Affected by other error of law, or "(e) Unsupported by material and substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted, or " (f) Arbitrary or capricious. "An aggrieved party may seek appellate review of any final judgment of the superior court in the manner provided by law as in other civil cases."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 61 Wash. App. 371 - Snohomish County v. Hinds

2. “to the governing body of each city within three miles of the exterior boundaries of such area”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 61 Wash. App. 371 - Snohomish County v. Hinds