53 Wis. 2d 787 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2012
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 60 Wis. 2d 54 - State v. Elson · 50 Wis. 2d 66 - State v. Stuart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The crime with which defendant was charged, uttering a forged check, has two elements: first, that the person utter as genuine . . . any forged writing, and second, that the person know that the writing has been falsely made or altered . . . .” Johnson v. State, 53 Wis. 2d 787, 791 , 193 N.W.2d 659 (1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[F]irst, that the person utter as genuine . . . any forged writing, and second, that the person know that the writing has been falsely made or altered, sec. 943.38(2), Stats.” Johnson v. State, 53 Wis. 2d 787, 791 , 193 N.W.2d 659 (1972). 8”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.