Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 530 F.2d 708 - Bilar Tool & Die Corp. v. Commissioner

Bilar Tool & Die Corp. v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

530 F.2d 708 · 1976

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 1999
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1999

4 federal appellate ·

80197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 263 (Interest Equalization Tax Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 368

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Richmond Television Corp. v. United States · United States v. Akin · United States v. Transamerica Corp. · Skenandoa Rayon Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “paid or incurred during the taxable year,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a change in the corporate structure for the benefit of future operations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.