United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
530 F.3d 1069 · 2008
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Struckman (2010), United States v. Borowy (2010)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wlhere an individual has been detained incident to a search warrant, and officers' questioning stays within the bounds of questioning permitted during a Terry stop, Miranda [warnings] are not required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Mumford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.