United States v. Hoffecker’s Empirical Analysis
530 F.3d 137 · 2008
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States v. Tomko (2009), United States v. Starnes (2009)
39 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 3292 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Olano · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · United States v. Dunnigan · Taylor v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n appellant’s brief must contain his or her argument, which must incorporate appellant's contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies”) (internal quotation marks omitted); United States v. Irizarry, 341 F.3d 273, 305 (3d Cir.2003) (finding it”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f a party introduces all or part of a writing or recorded statement, an adverse party may require the introduction, at that time, of any other part-or any other writing or recorded statement-that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one-sentence footnote falls far short of meeting the requirement that an appellant raise an issue in his opening brief or else waive the issue on appeal”); Laborers' Int’l Union of N.A. v. Foster Wheeler Corp., 26 F.3d 375 , 398 (3d Cir.1994) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.