State v. Loyd’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2018
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · Brown v. Texas · Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz · 483 So. 2d 433 - State v. Jones · State v. Hilleshiem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he essential purpose of the proscriptions of the Fourth Amendment “is to impose a standard of ‘reasonableness’ upon the exercise of discretion by government officials, including law enforcement agents[,] in order ‘to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasion....’””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Legg · State v. Breuer“Sentencing decisions of the trial court are cloaked with a strong presumption in their favor, and an abuse of discretion will not be found unless the defendant shows that such discretion was exercised on grounds or for reasons clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sailer · State v. Phillips“Generally, a sentencing court is not required to give its reasons for rejecting particular sentencing options.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.