Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 530 P2D 1272 - State v. Mills

State v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 10 Utah 2d 34 - State v. Ward · 6 Utah 2d 110 - State v. Sullivan · 10 Utah 2d 162 - State v. Danks · 11 Utah 2d 208 - State v. Berchtold · 12 Utah 2d 162 - State v. Horne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a defendant to prevail upon a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction, it must appear that viewing the evidence and all inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the verdict of the jury, reasonable minds could not believe him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.