Darghty v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

cited by 25 later decisions

states following

May 2015

most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State (2003), 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State (2007)

24 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Taylor v. Illinois · James v. Valtierra · Celestine v. Blackburn · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“1) Upon defense objection, the trial court should give the defendant a reasonable opportunity to become familiar with the undisclosed evidence by interviewing the witness, inspecting the physical evidence, etc. 2) If, after this opportunity for familiarization, the defendant believes he may be prejudiced by lack of opportunity to prepare to meet the evidence, he must request a continuance. Failure to do so constitutes a waiver of the issue. 3) If the defendant does request a continuance the State may choose to proceed with trial and forego using the undisclosed evidence.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 755 So. 2d 537 - Prewitt v. State · 562 So. 2d 1199 - Carraway v. State
“Conduct by third parties not connected with the law enforcement officers in the investigation will not vitiate a confession which might be rendered incompetent and inadmissible if such conduct had been committed by a law enforcement officer.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 56 Wash. App. 655 - State v. McCullough · Rutledge v. State
“willful and motivated by a desire to obtain a tactical advantage.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Skaggs v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.