¶1The defendant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish a violation. We find his arguments unpersuasive. The written order of revocation fails, however, to indicate the grounds of Segarra’s probation violation although at the sentencing hearing the trial court made such a statement. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of the defendant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a proper written order corresponding with its oral pronouncement. Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
530 So. 2d 492
530 So.2d 492
13 Fla.L.Weekly 2076
Segarra v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 2, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-09-02
Relies on 429 So. 2d 821 - Brown v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-09-02
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2000
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →