Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

530 So. 2d 970

530 So.2d 970

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1911

Fox v. Fox

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-08-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse that portion of a child custody and visitation order which placed the mother in charge of personally supervising the former husband’s visitation with their son. In most cases where supervised child visitation is required, it is counterproductive for both the parties and the court to place one parent in charge of monitoring the other parent’s visitation of the child. For the parents, such an arrangement affords the needless opportunity to provoke lingering animosity. From the trial court’s perspective,' when modification of such a visitation order is sought, there is no neutral and objective monitor to apprise the court regarding the parents’ discharge of their visitation obligations and rights. For these reasons, the order is reversed with directions that the trial court appoint a suitably neutral and impartial party to be present at and monitor paternal visitation. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

/530/so2d/970 · .json · Public domain