Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1993
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · Collins v. State · 135 Tex. Crim. 430 - Walding v. State · 33 Tex. Crim. 163 - Bell v. State · 109 Tex. Crim. 234 - Giles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . It is well established as a general rule that upon the trial of one charged with crime it is not permissible to show that another jointly or separately indicted for the same offense has been convicted or acquitted. Wharton’s Crim. Evidence, 11 Ed., Vol. 2, p. 1216, Sec. 724; 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 784, p. 1334; Giles v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 234 , 4 S.W.2d 66 ; Bell v. State, 33 Tex.Cr.R. 163 , 25 S.W. 769 ; Harper v. State, 11 Tex.App. 1 ; Walding V. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 430 , 120 S.W.2d 1052 . Cited in the notes under the sections in the text books will be found many cases from other jurisdictions supporting the principal announced in the Texas cases (supra).” Id. at 573.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McClure v. State · Adams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.