Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 530 SW2D 714 - State v. Granberry

State v. Granberry’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Thompson (1981), State v. Healey (1978)

30 state decisions

15019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mahan v. Howell · State v. Reese · Achilli v. United States · United States v. Calvert · State v. Tiedt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Giving the words of this section their ordinary and usual sense ... the statute requires the first indictment to remain suspended pending the period the second is in force, unless actually quashed by the court on the record; but, if the second is itself quashed without the first having been quashed, the first is restored to all its vigor, and we are not authorized to hold that it is quashed ipso facto by the preferment of a second indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “filed,” a claim we need not reach in light of our disposition. 3 . This statute, which was § 2522, RSMo 1899, when Melvin was decided, states: "If there be at any time pending against the same defendant two indictments for the same offense, or two indictments for the same matter, although charged as different offenses, the indictment first found shall be deemed to be suspended by such second indictment, and shall be quashed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.