Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 530 SW2D 913 - Deen v. Deen

Deen v. Deen’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1983
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Armstrong v. Manzo · Alexander v. Hagedorn · McEwen v. Harrison · Crawford v. McDonald · Deen v. Kirk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Rosser case modified the [Hagedorn ] rule to the extent that where an officer of the court gives wrong information which prevents the filing of a motion for new trial by the losing party, the movant in a bill of review is excused from complying with requirement (2) above [that the defendant was prevented from making his meritorious defense by fraud, accident or wrongful act of the opposite party], Otherwise, the rule of Hagedorn was approved (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.