Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 F.2d 1114 - Crawford v. Cushman

Crawford v. Cushman’s Empirical Analysis

531 F.2d 1114 · 1976

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2019
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Weiss United States (1994), Francis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1976)

57 federal appellate · 13 district ·

56019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Roe v. Wade · Stanley v. Illinois · Dandridge v. Williams · Griswold v. State of Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[J]udges are not given the task of running the Army, The responsibility for setting up channels through which such grievances can be considered and fairly settled rests upon the Congress and upon the President of the United States and his subordinates. The military constitutes a specialized community governed by a separate discipline from that of the civilian. Orderly government requires that the judiciary be as scrupulous not to interfere with legitimate Army matters as the Army must be scrupulous not to intervene in judicial matters. [Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 , 93, 73 S.Ct. 534 , 539, 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953).]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In light of Levy, Ballard and Frontiero we find there to be no basis for a judicial deference to the military here which precludes review of appellant’s substantive constitutional claims. At issue is “one of the liberties” the Supreme Court has declared to be long recognized as protected by the Constitution: “freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a succession of cases in this circuit and others has reiterated the proposition that the military is subject to the Bill of Rights and its constitutional implications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.