Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 F.2d 1162 - National Labor Relations Board v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local 338

National Labor Relations Board v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local 338’s Empirical Analysis

531 F.2d 1162 · 1976

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently September 1996 · most notably Galindo v. Stoody Co. (1986), Kapcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1991)

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

520197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations Board · Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc. · Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc., National Labor Relations Board v. Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer--... (3) by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment ... to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization ....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The policy of Secs. 8(a)(3) and 8(b)(2) is to insulate employees' jobs from their organization rights.... For the Union to employ job related benefits to maintain its own organization would, thus, fly in the face of this statutory purpose.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “employees to be 'good' union members, to support and assist the union, or to participate in union activities,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.