National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local # 1913’s Empirical Analysis
531 F.2d 424 · 1976
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Amato v. Bernard (1980), National Labor Relations Board v. Silver Spur Casino (1980)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Arroyo v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc. · Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 302 was intended to regulate payments by employers to employee representatives, and was aimed at forestalling practices Congress considered injurious to the collective bargaining process such as bribery of employee representatives by employers, extortion by employee representatives, and the potential abuse of power by union officials armed with sole control of welfare funds, (citing Arroyo v. United States, 359 U.S. 419 , 79 S.Ct. 864 , 3 L.Ed.2d 915 (1959)).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“One who has title to property which he agrees to hold for the benefit and subject to the control of another is an agent-trustee and is subject to the rules of agency. (Emphasis added.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he mischief which Section 302 was designed to eliminate is clearly not present ..., and there is no need to invoke the safeguards of this statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.