Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 F.2d 474 - Olson v. Philco-Ford

Olson v. Philco-Ford’s Empirical Analysis

531 F.2d 474 · 1976

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (1976), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (1983)

18 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

19019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Triangle Improvement Council v. Ritchie · Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp. · Taylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) that [the plaintiff] belongs to a . minority; (ii) that he applied and was qualified for a job for which the employer was seeking applicants; (iii) that, despite his qualifications, he was rejected; and (iv) that, after his rejection, the position remained open and the employer continued to seek applicants from persons of plaintiff’s qualifications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.