Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 F.2d 68 - Dinko v. Wall

Dinko v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis

531 F.2d 68 · 1976

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Loretangeli v. Critelli (1988), George Haeberle v. Board of Trustees of Buffalo Carpenters Health-Care, Dental, Pension Andsupplemental Funds (1980)

18 federal appellate · 4 district ·

25019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schlagenhauf v. Holder · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Dioguardi v. United States · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Viscardi v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When any officer, agent, shop steward, or representative of any labor organization is alleged to have violated the duties declared in subsection (a) of this section and the labor organization or its governing board or officers refuse or fail to sue or recover damages or secure an accounting or other appropriate relief within a reasonable time after being requested to do so by any member of the labor organization, such member may sue such officer, agent, shop steward, or representative in any district court of the United States or in any State court of competent jurisdiction to recover damages or secure an accounting or other appropriate relief for the benefit of the labor organization. No such proceeding shall be brought except upon leave of the court obtained upon verified application and for good cause shown, which application may be made ex parte. The trial judge may allot a reasonable part of the recovery in any action under this subsection to pay the fees of counsel prosecuting the suit at the instance of the member of the labor organization and to compensate such member for any expenses necessarily paid or incurred by him in connection with the litigation.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plaintiff must show a reasonable likelihood of success and, with regard to any material facts he alleges, must have a reasonable ground for belief in their existence.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.