Loho v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
531 F.3d 1016 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Farah v. Ashcroft · Malhi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Don v. Gonzales · Singh v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“history of willingly returning to his or her home country militates against a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.