Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 F.3d 1028 - Nader v. Brewer

Nader v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

531 F.3d 1028 · 2008

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Libertarian Party v. Judd (2013), Nader v. Blackwell (2008)

15 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

390200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Storer v. Brown · Burdick v. Takushi · Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Federal courts have generally looked with favor on requiring petition circulators to agree to submit to jurisdiction . . . and the courts have viewed such a system to be a more narrowly tailored means than a residency requirement to achieve the same result.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “exclude[d] from eligibility all persons who support the candidate but who ... live outside the state of Arizona.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Election cases are difficult. The historical background for such litigation changes rapidly.... [Bjallot-access requirements ... have proved difficult for courts to evaluate, given both the state’s compelling interests in preventing fraud and providing orderly election administration, and the Constitution’s mandate for free political expression and participation that require such ballot-access restrictions to survive strict scrutiny.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.