Warren Freedenfeld Associates, Inc. v. McTigue’s Empirical Analysis
531 F.3d 38 · 2008
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 18 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Psihoyos v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2014), Anthony Artuso v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2011)
6 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 507 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid · Trw Inc v. Adelaide Andrews · Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No v. Superline Transportation Company Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“accrues only when a plaintiff knows or has sufficient reason to know of the conduct upon which the claim is grounded.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“some reason to investigate whether he may have suffered an injury at the hands of a putative infringer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“leave no doubt that [the] asserted claim is time-barred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.